Cost of Living: New Hampshire vs Wisconsin
Wisconsin is cheaper for a single adult by about $764/month, mainly driven by rent.
Comparison at a glance
- Monthly difference$764/moWisconsin saves vs New Hampshire
- Housing difference$400/moWisconsin cheaper on 1BR rent
- Grocery difference$80/moWisconsin has a lighter basket
- Equivalent salary≈ $94,000$75,000 in Wisconsin → New Hampshire
- Cheaper overallWisconsin~25% lower single-adult budget
- Affordability winnerWisconsinLower combined rent + essentials
Side-by-side single-adult budget
The big differences between New Hampshire and Wisconsin come down to rent and tax. Groceries, transport, and utilities are usually within 10–15%; housing can swing the total by hundreds of dollars per month.
Cost of Living Verdict
Six quick takes on where New Hampshire and Wisconsin actually pull ahead.
- Cheaper overallWisconsin
Wisconsin runs about $764/mo lower for a single-adult budget (~25% cheaper).
- Better housing affordabilityWisconsin
Average 1BR rent is $1,200 vs $1,600.
- Better for familiesWisconsin
Wisconsin keeps the family-of-four monthly total lower thanks to cheaper 2BR rent and groceries.
- Better for retireesWisconsin
Wisconsin combines lower rent and healthcare with a softer income-tax burden — easier on a fixed pension.
- Better for remote workersWisconsin
Wisconsin has a lower cost index (94 vs 113), so an out-of-state salary stretches further.
- Better purchasing powerNew Hampshire
New Hampshire has a stronger median-income-to-cost ratio — local wages cover more of the typical basket.
What this difference means in practice
The headline gap broken into the four buckets that actually move household budgets.
- Housing impact
Wisconsin is roughly 33% cheaper on housing (~$400/mo less than New Hampshire) — compounds quickly across a year.
- Daily spending
Wisconsin is roughly 20% cheaper on groceries (~$80/mo less than New Hampshire) — compounds quickly across a year.
- Transport & utilities
Wisconsin is roughly 20% cheaper on transport + utilities (~$128/mo less than New Hampshire) — compounds quickly across a year.
- Lifestyle
Wisconsin is roughly 20% cheaper on lifestyle (dining + extras) (~$95/mo less than New Hampshire) — compounds quickly across a year.
Purchasing power snapshot
Which region stretches a dollar further, category by category.
- Housingstrong advantageWisconsin
Wisconsin is the cheaper place to rent or own.
- Groceriesmoderate advantageWisconsin
Weekly grocery basket is lighter in Wisconsin.
- Utilitiesmoderate advantageWisconsin
Lower monthly utility load in Wisconsin.
- Transportmoderate advantageWisconsin
Cheaper commuting overall in Wisconsin.
- Healthcaremoderate advantageWisconsin
Lower out-of-pocket healthcare in Wisconsin.
- Lifestylemoderate advantageWisconsin
Dining, entertainment, and extras are cheaper in Wisconsin.
Who benefits more?
The same comparison reads very differently depending on the household.
- FamiliesWisconsin
Lower 2BR rent and grocery load make Wisconsin the easier family budget.
- SinglesWisconsin
Cheaper 1BR rent and entertainment costs tilt to Wisconsin.
- RetireesWisconsin
Wisconsin eases housing and healthcare — important on a fixed income.
- Remote workersWisconsin
An out-of-state salary stretches further in Wisconsin thanks to a lower cost index.
- StudentsWisconsin
Lower rent and commuting costs make Wisconsin easier on a tight student budget.
- High earnersNew Hampshire
New Hampshire blends a more efficient tax load with stronger local incomes.
Equivalent lifestyle salary
How much you'd need in New Hampshire to match the lifestyle a given salary buys in Wisconsin.
needed in New Hampshire for the same lifestyle.
needed in New Hampshire for the same lifestyle.
needed in New Hampshire for the same lifestyle.
Housing affordability
Housing is the dominant gap: Wisconsin runs roughly 33% cheaper on 1BR rent and 34% cheaper on 2BR — enough to reshape household budgets.
Ownership affordability follows the same shape: lower rents typically signal more attainable mortgage payments at similar incomes.
Category-by-category
| Category | New Hampshire | Wisconsin | Lower |
|---|---|---|---|
| Housing (1BR rent) | $1,600 | $1,200 | Wisconsin |
| Groceries | $475 | $395 | Wisconsin |
| Utilities | $220 | $183 | Wisconsin |
| Transportation | $542 | $451 | Wisconsin |
| Healthcare | $362 | $301 | Wisconsin |
| Top income tax | 0.0% | 0.1% | Tied |
| Lifestyle (dining + extras) | $565 | $470 | Wisconsin |
Comparison FAQ
- Is New Hampshire more expensive than Wisconsin?
- New Hampshire is roughly 25% more expensive than Wisconsin for a single-adult monthly budget — about $764 more per month.
- How much salary do I need to move from Wisconsin to New Hampshire?
- If $100,000 supports your lifestyle in Wisconsin, you'd need roughly $125,500 in New Hampshire to maintain the same purchasing power.
- Which region offers better affordability?
- Wisconsin comes out lower on the combined single-adult budget — about $764/mo cheaper than New Hampshire.
- Is housing significantly cheaper in one of them?
- Housing is the dominant gap: Wisconsin runs roughly 33% cheaper on 1BR rent and 34% cheaper on 2BR — enough to reshape household budgets.
- Can a remote worker benefit from moving?
- Yes — a remote salary anchored to New Hampshire rates stretches further in Wisconsin, where local prices and taxes are lower.
- What income is considered comfortable in New Hampshire?
- Roughly $58,000/yr gross typically supports a comfortable single-adult lifestyle in New Hampshire, leaving room for savings on top of monthly costs.
Related cost-of-living comparisons
- New Hampshire vs Vermont cost of living
- New Hampshire vs Maine cost of living
- New Hampshire vs Massachusetts cost of living
- Wisconsin vs Minnesota cost of living
- Wisconsin vs Iowa cost of living
- Wisconsin vs Illinois cost of living
- Wisconsin vs Michigan cost of living
- Wisconsin vs Vermont cost of living
- Wisconsin vs Maine cost of living
- Wisconsin vs Massachusetts cost of living
Deep-dive each region
People also compare
These estimates are approximate and may vary by city, taxes, rent, family size, and personal spending. Use them as a starting point, not a substitute for personalised financial or tax advice.