Cost of Living: Idaho vs Montana

Quick answer

Montana is cheaper for a single adult by about $93/month, mainly driven by rent.

Share this guide
Snapshot

Comparison at a glance

Idaho vs Montana
  • Monthly difference
    $93/mo
    Montana saves vs Idaho
  • Housing difference
    $150/mo
    Montana cheaper on 1BR rent
  • Grocery difference
    $12/mo
    Idaho has a lighter basket
  • Equivalent salary
    ≈ $77,500
    $75,000 in Montana → Idaho
  • Cheaper overall
    Montana
    ~3% lower single-adult budget
  • Affordability winner
    Montana
    Lower combined rent + essentials
Monthly budget

Side-by-side single-adult budget

Idaho
Housing (rent + insurance)
$1,250
40%
Transportation
$475
15%
Groceries
$416
13%
Utilities & internet
$193
6%
Healthcare
$317
10%
Entertainment & dining
$218
7%
Misc & personal
$277
9%
Total: $3,146/mo
Montana
Housing (rent + insurance)
$1,100
36%
Transportation
$490
16%
Groceries
$428
14%
Utilities & internet
$199
7%
Healthcare
$326
11%
Entertainment & dining
$224
7%
Misc & personal
$286
9%
Total: $3,053/mo
What this means in real life

The big differences between Idaho and Montana come down to rent and tax. Groceries, transport, and utilities are usually within 10–15%; housing can swing the total by hundreds of dollars per month.

More comparisons
Explore neighbors
Side-by-side

Cost of Living Verdict

Six quick takes on where Idaho and Montana actually pull ahead.

  • Cheaper overall
    Montana

    Montana runs about $93/mo lower for a single-adult budget (~3% cheaper).

  • Better housing affordability
    Montana

    Average 1BR rent is $1,100 vs $1,250.

  • Better for families
    Tie

    Family-of-four budgets land in the same ballpark.

  • Better for retirees
    Tie

    Healthcare, rent, and tax pressure are comparable for fixed-income retirees.

  • Better for remote workers
    Idaho

    Idaho has a lower cost index (99 vs 102), so an out-of-state salary stretches further.

  • Better purchasing power
    Idaho

    Idaho has a stronger median-income-to-cost ratio — local wages cover more of the typical basket.

In practice

What this difference means in practice

The headline gap broken into the four buckets that actually move household budgets.

  • Housing impact

    Montana is roughly 14% cheaper on housing (~$150/mo less than Idaho) — compounds quickly across a year.

  • Daily spending

    Idaho runs about 3% cheaper on groceries than Montana — noticeable, but not a deciding factor on its own.

  • Transport & utilities

    Idaho runs about 3% cheaper on transport + utilities than Montana — noticeable, but not a deciding factor on its own.

  • Lifestyle

    Idaho runs about 3% cheaper on lifestyle (dining + extras) than Montana — noticeable, but not a deciding factor on its own.

Purchasing power

Purchasing power snapshot

Which region stretches a dollar further, category by category.

  • Housing
    moderate advantage
    Montana

    Montana is the cheaper place to rent or own.

  • Groceries
    tie
    Tied

    Grocery baskets cost about the same.

  • Utilities
    slight advantage
    Idaho

    Lower monthly utility load in Idaho.

  • Transport
    slight advantage
    Idaho

    Cheaper commuting overall in Idaho.

  • Healthcare
    tie
    Tied

    Out-of-pocket healthcare is comparable.

  • Lifestyle
    slight advantage
    Idaho

    Dining, entertainment, and extras are cheaper in Idaho.

By household

Who benefits more?

The same comparison reads very differently depending on the household.

  • Families
    Tie

    Family budgets are similar in both regions.

  • Singles
    Montana

    Cheaper 1BR rent and entertainment costs tilt to Montana.

  • Retirees
    Tie

    Housing, healthcare, and tax pressure look similar.

  • Remote workers
    Idaho

    An out-of-state salary stretches further in Idaho thanks to a lower cost index.

  • Students
    Montana

    Lower rent and commuting costs make Montana easier on a tight student budget.

  • High earners
    Idaho

    Idaho blends a more efficient tax load with stronger local incomes.

Equivalency

Equivalent lifestyle salary

How much you'd need in Idaho to match the lifestyle a given salary buys in Montana.

$50,000 in Montana
$51,500

needed in Idaho for the same lifestyle.

$75,000 in Montana
$77,500

needed in Idaho for the same lifestyle.

$100,000 in Montana
$103,000

needed in Idaho for the same lifestyle.

Housing

Housing affordability

Idaho
1BR rent
$1,250
2BR rent
$1,500
Montana
1BR rent
$1,100
2BR rent
$1,300

Montana is noticeably more affordable on rent — about $150/mo cheaper for a 1BR.

Ownership affordability follows the same shape: lower rents typically signal more attainable mortgage payments at similar incomes.

By category

Category-by-category

CategoryIdahoMontanaLower
Housing (1BR rent)$1,250$1,100Montana
Groceries$416$428Tied
Utilities$193$199Idaho
Transportation$475$490Idaho
Healthcare$317$326Tied
Top income tax0.1%0.1%Tied
Lifestyle (dining + extras)$495$510Idaho
FAQ

Comparison FAQ

Is Idaho more expensive than Montana?
Idaho is roughly 3% more expensive than Montana for a single-adult monthly budget — about $93 more per month.
How much salary do I need to move from Montana to Idaho?
If $100,000 supports your lifestyle in Montana, you'd need roughly $103,000 in Idaho to maintain the same purchasing power.
Which region offers better affordability?
Montana comes out lower on the combined single-adult budget — about $93/mo cheaper than Idaho.
Is housing significantly cheaper in one of them?
Montana is noticeably more affordable on rent — about $150/mo cheaper for a 1BR.
Can a remote worker benefit from moving?
Both regions land close on cost index and tax — relocation arbitrage is modest for remote workers.
What income is considered comfortable in Idaho?
Roughly $59,000/yr gross typically supports a comfortable single-adult lifestyle in Idaho, leaving room for savings on top of monthly costs.
Keep comparing

Related cost-of-living comparisons

Deep dive

Deep-dive each region

Keep exploring

These estimates are approximate and may vary by city, taxes, rent, family size, and personal spending. Use them as a starting point, not a substitute for personalised financial or tax advice.